August 1, 2022
The hierarchy of controls implemented to manage and prevent needlestick injuries, delivers 5 key criteria to drive sharps injury risk reduction. In its hierarchy of most effective to least effective, the ‘elimination of hazards’ is the most effective control, and the adoption of ‘personal protective equipment’ is the least.
Elimination of Hazard
In the context of needlestick injury risk, the elimination of hazards from the patient environment is critical. The most effective adopters of this methodology have executed the following changes within their healthcare setting:
Engineering controls are mechanisms that can positively influence the safety of the sharps deposition and staff contact. The most common controls that drive the greatest impact in sharps injury reduction are:
Administrative controls are directly impacted by the “exposure environment” and committee / departmental focus; ultimately asking the question of how we will ensure we positively direct and reinforce sharps disposal behaviours across leadership, full time staff, and temporary staff.
Work Practice Controls
Work practice controls are executed “in practice” – to dissect this simply, “when you have a sharps in your hand, what do you do?” The basic safety principles that follow the hierarchy of control are as follows:
Personal Protective Equipment
This is your basic ‘occupational risk management’ – removing the barriers and filters that exist between the healthcare worker and the hazard to minimise risk:
Review of Hierarchy of Controls pertaining to needlestick injuries
Reducing needlestick injuries by the greatest amount possible, must entail a combination of the following initiatives:
Let’s bring this home | Adequate sharps risk management for healthcare workers
Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids (BBF) as well as percutaneous injuries from sharps, together pose a serious threat to public health. An estimated 30+ million healthcare workers face a pathogen-exposure risk from sharps injuries which, although preventable, are often regarded a systemic part of the job.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 9 percent of healthcare workers face bloodborne pathogen exposure each year2, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) asserts that more than 600 000 sharps-related injuries are incurred by healthcare workers each year.3
Increasing workloads and poor organisation have attributed to two-fold increases in sharps injury risk and near-misses to hospital workers4 together with an increasing amount of research tying fatigue and stress to sharps exposure rates.5
Sharps injury reduction is not a one-dimensional solution
Ultimately, a sharps exposure reduction solution must look at all facets of sharps injury risk:
To comprehend and drive sharps injury reduction in healthcare facilities, we need to look at a broader safety system that drives protection across the full spectrum of sharps management from the healthcare worker through to the laundry worker who could encounter an incorrectly disposed needle in the laundry. If you would like further information on how Daniels can help drive needlestick injury reduction in your facility, reach out to us today by calling Melanie Marcelino on 031 267 9700 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Al-Benna S. Needlestick an sharps injuries among theatre care professionals. J Perioper Pract. 2010 Dec;20(12):440-5. PubMed PMID: 21265403.
Clarke SP, Rockett JL, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses. Am J Infect Control. 2002 Jun;30(4):207-16.
Clarke SP. Hospital work environments, nurse characteristics, and sharps injuries. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Jun;35(5):302-9.